Friday, September 18, 2026

Parents playing with kids

 

Rough-and-tumble play between a father and a child is one of the most important developmental experiences a child can have, and no other relationship provides it in the same way. A 2008 systematic review found that father-child physical play teaches emotional regulation, boundary-setting, and the ability to read arousal cues, all skills that predict social success later in life. When a father wrestles, chases, or tumbles with a child on the floor, the child is learning something specific: how to be excited without losing control. The play ramps up arousal, joy, energy, and physical intensity, and the father's role is to help the child learn where the edge is. The child who learns to pull back from "too much" during play is the child who can manage frustration, excitement, and anger in the classroom. The review found that the quality of father-child play, specifically how well the father calibrated the intensity to the child's signals, predicted the child's behaviour in school. Fathers who were attuned, meaning they could tell when the child was tipping from fun into distress and adjusted accordingly, had children with fewer behaviour problems years later. Mothers play differently. Maternal play tends to be structured, toy-based, and language-rich, all of which support cognitive development. Paternal play tends to be physical, unpredictable, and arousal-heavy, which supports emotional development. The child needs both, and the research says neither can fully substitute for the other. The dad on the floor getting climbed on is not killing time. He is the only person in the child's life providing a specific type of training that the brain needs, and the studies that tracked those children found the effects lasting into adolescence. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18052995/

https://x.com/anishmoonka/status/2100502520632320436?s=20



Part 2. Rough-and-tumble play makes children more aggressive, but only when the father stops running the game. A 2009 study filmed 85 children aged 2 to 6 wrestling with their fathers at home, then rated how much each father controlled the play. The results split cleanly along that line. Children whose fathers ranked low on dominance during play were more physically aggressive, and the more they played, the worse it got. In the families where the father stayed in charge, frequent rough play carried no such cost. How often they played predicted nothing on its own. Who was steering predicted almost all of it. A dominant playmate here is the father who sets the pace, calls the stop, decides when the game has tipped over, and lets the child win on purpose. He is running the thermostat. Take him out of that role and the wrestling match becomes two children on the floor, where the child learns that escalation works. A 2017 review pooled 16 studies covering 1,521 father-child pairs and found the same pattern in weaker form. Father-child physical play was linked to aggression, social competence, emotional skills and self-regulation, with effects ranging from weak to moderate. The authors were blunt about why the numbers stay small. Most studies counted how often families played. Almost none measured how well. Counting hours is easy, and quality is the part that decides the outcome. So the floor time is the entry fee. Reading the child while you are down there, catching the moment the laughing turns to panic, and stopping it before it arrives is the actual work. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19431190/


Part 3. Fathers who push their children to the edge of what they can handle have children with less social anxiety. Mothers who do the same thing have children with more. A Dutch study observed 94 families with their 2- and 4-year-olds, coded the behaviour, and found the split going in opposite directions. Researchers call it challenging parenting behaviour: playfully daring a child past their comfort zone. Throwing them higher than they expected. Tickling past the point they asked you to stop. Encouraging the jump from the wall that looks slightly too high. Fathers who did more of this had 4-year-olds who showed less social anxiety with a stranger six months later. Mothers who did more of it had 4-year-olds who showed more. Neither pattern appeared for the 2-year-olds, and neither appeared in how parents rated their own children, which only tracked their earlier ratings. Trained observers caught the effect while the parent questionnaires missed it completely. Follow those children forward and the pattern holds. A 2019 analysis of 476 families tracked from infancy found that father-child play quality in first grade predicted fewer emotional regulation problems by third grade, and those children reported fewer anxiety and depression symptoms at 15. Mothers' ratings of the same children did not carry the chain. A German study followed 44 families for 16 years and found that fathers' sensitive, challenging play in toddlerhood predicted how their children thought about relationships at 10 and at 16. For the teenagers, fathers' play quality was the only thing that predicted it. Forty-four families is a small group, and observed anxiety in a lab is a narrow measure. The direction is consistent across three separate teams, though, and the mechanism is the same one every time. A child learns that big feelings are survivable by having them in a safe place with someone who has done it before. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23812638/


Part 4. Becoming a father cuts a man's testosterone by about a quarter, and the men doing the most hands-on care drop the furthest. Researchers tracked 624 men in the Philippines from age 21, before any of them had children, and measured their hormones again four and a half years later. Men with high morning testosterone at the start were more likely to become partnered fathers by follow-up. Once they did, their morning testosterone fell by a median of 26 percent and their evening levels by 34 percent, far steeper than the drop in men who stayed single and childless. Fathers putting in three or more hours of daily childcare had the lowest levels of all. A 2014 study scanned 89 parents caring for their firstborn and found a single caregiving network running across mothers and fathers alike. In fathers raising infants with no mother involved, the emotional alarm centre and the region that reads other people's intentions were firing together, the same signature primary-caregiving mothers showed. Across every father in the study, the strength of that connection tracked the hours spent in direct childcare. That same window carries a cost few men are warned about. A meta-analysis of 43 studies covering 28,004 people put depression in fathers at 10.4 percent across pregnancy and the first year, rising to 25.6 percent between three and six months after the birth. Roughly one father in four struggles in that specific stretch. A UK study of 8,431 fathers found that depression in the weeks after birth doubled the odds of emotional and behavioural problems in their children at 3.5 years, and boys were at 2.7 times the odds of conduct problems. Those effects held after accounting for the mother's depression and the father's later depression. A man's body changes to prepare him for this. Nobody tells him that, and the silence in that window costs his children something measurable. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21911391/


Part 5. How often a separated father sees his children predicts almost nothing about how they turn out. Researchers pooled 63 studies. Contact frequency came back unrelated to child outcomes in general, while what he actually did during those hours was related to every one of them. Children who felt close to their fathers did better academically and had fewer behavioural and emotional problems. So did children whose fathers parented authoritatively, meaning warm and firm at the same time, holding the line without going cold. Paying child support showed up as positive too. Turning up did not, on its own. A study of 1,116 twin pairs sharpened the point further. The less time fathers spent living with their children, the more conduct problems those children had, which is the finding everyone expects. It reversed for one group. Where fathers scored high on antisocial behaviour, more time living together produced more conduct problems. The authors described those children as receiving a double dose of risk, genetic and environmental. A meta-analysis covering 160,927 children tested 17 outcomes and found spanking linked to worse results on 13 of them. It was linked to better results on zero. Cowan and colleagues ran the version of this that matters most, a randomised trial of 289 low-income families followed for 18 months. Fathers assigned to a 16-week group became more engaged with their children, and those children had fewer behaviour problems. The families assigned to a 16-week couples group did better still, and their gains lasted longer. Strengthening the parents' relationship moved the father more than coaching the father alone did. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12625439/





Monday, September 14, 2026

Video game therapy

 


Playing Super Mario 64 for 30 minutes a day for two months physically grew the brains of the people who played it. A 2014 study in Molecular Psychiatry scanned participants before and after two months of daily play and found increases in grey matter in three regions involved in memory, planning, and fine motor control. The study was led by Simone Kuhn at the Max Planck Institute in Berlin. She gave 23 adults a Nintendo DS and told them to play Super Mario 64 for at least 30 minutes a day for two months. A control group played nothing. MRI scans taken before and after showed that the Mario group had measurable increases in grey matter in the right hippocampus, the right prefrontal cortex, and the cerebellum, and the increases were not found in the control group. The hippocampus is where the brain stores spatial maps. Super Mario 64 is a game built entirely around navigating three-dimensional space, jumping between platforms, remembering which doors lead where, and building a mental model of a world that does not exist. The brain treats a virtual world the same way it treats a real one: it maps it, stores it, and grows to accommodate it. The prefrontal cortex handles planning and strategy, which the game demands constantly. The cerebellum handles timing and coordination, which every jump requires. The brain was not just entertained. It was being trained, and the tissue responded the same way muscle responds to a weight: it got bigger. Kuhn said the results suggest that video game training could be used as a therapy for conditions where these brain regions are reduced, including post-traumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, and age-related brain shrinkage. The prescription is a plumber in a red hat, 30 minutes a day. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24166407/

https://x.com/anishmoonka/status/2099672047735414940?s=20



If you played Pokemon as a kid, your brain built a region specifically for recognising Pokemon characters, and it is still there. A 2019 study at Stanford, published in Nature Human Behaviour, scanned the brains of adults who played the game before age eight and found a dedicated patch of visual cortex that lights up for Pikachu the way another part lights up for faces. The researcher, Jesse Gomez, was himself a childhood Pokemon player, and he recruited 11 adults who had played the original Game Boy games as children and 11 who had not. When both groups were shown images of Pokemon characters inside a brain scanner, the experienced players showed strong activation in a specific fold called the occipitotemporal sulcus. The non-players showed almost no response there. The reason the brain carved out a region for Pokemon comes down to how the game was played. A child staring at a small Game Boy screen is looking at tiny characters in the centre of their field of vision, hour after hour, during the years when the visual cortex is most willing to be shaped. The brain treats those hours the same way it treats hours of looking at faces or reading words: it builds a dedicated processing region for whatever it sees the most. The finding confirmed a theory called eccentricity bias, which predicts that the size and location of an object on your retina during childhood determines where the brain will store it. Small, central objects end up in a different part of the cortex than large, peripheral ones, and Pokemon characters, viewed on a tiny screen held close to the face, landed exactly where the theory predicted. Your childhood Game Boy is still inside your skull. The hours you spent catching them all built a piece of your brain that is there right now, waiting to recognise a Charmander. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31061489/

https://x.com/anishmoonka/status/2099656947909922990?s=20

more than a community

 

To LDSX, My son started this. Before he was born, the love Heavenly Father has for His children was an idea. I could defend it. I did not know it. Then I looked into my boy's eyes and the idea became a fact. In one second I understood what decades of study never gave me. This is what a father feels for his son. This is what He feels for us, multiplied past anything I can hold. This journey is not for me. It is for him. I have shared this before. Grandparents who chose estrangement. Children who came late in my life. A family scattered by geography across generations. My kitchen table is empty. There is no grandmother in the next room and no uncle down the street. When my son looks up from that table he sees his mother and me and nothing behind us. I want him to inherit more than a community. I want him to inherit a people. I want to know that if something happens to me, men will show up on the porch. Men who will take him into the mountains. Men who will put their hands on his head and bless him. Men who will look him in the eye at fourteen and tell him what a man of God is and expect him to become one. I want to know he will be held. Not managed. Held. I know the Church can do this. I watched it happen in the nineties. It took boys and handed them back to their mothers as men. Scouts. Quorums that worked like a tribe. Missions that broke boys open and rebuilt them. Wards where every man in the room was your father's friend, and every one of them would have driven through the night for you. I have serious doubts it still does this. No more Scouts. Rainbow flags. An erosion of the culture that made those men, and everyone inside the building can feel it, including the ones who will not say it out loud. So I ask hard questions. And because the questions are hard, some of you have decided I am a wolf in sheep's clothing, or a man who found a niche and is farming it for attention. I have no ulterior motive. I am not building a brand. I have never told a Saint to leave, and I never will. I tell them to stay and keep their covenants. I am not trying to pull anyone out of the fold. I am trying to find out whether the fold is still there, because I intend to put my son inside it. I am in the pews on Sunday with him on my lap while I find out. Thank you

https://x.com/nicoraytruth/status/2099709967116955759?s=20

And Jesus said unto her, “Neither do I condemn thee; go, and sin no more.” Be men, not women. Be fathers, not mothers. Be the priesthood of the apostles. you have let feminism creep into your house and you don't realize it because it masquerades as compassion.


Oh Kirk… this community of saints is still the core of the church and the pop-culture LDSX/youtube influencer present a skewed view. You will find the clear view if you will show up, every Sunday, at every invitation to serve — when you put your shoulder to the wheel and push — when you make and keep covenants. You will find your people! Your family! Your home! — And these online controversies and apostate fringes — these tares among us — will be a challenge to be met with faith in Christ and a love for God and for all men.


We’re not afraid of the hard questions, you just don’t like the answers. We (those willing to follow the prophet) are leaving the wandering in the wilderness to get ready to enter the promised land. There were different objectives in the 90’s church. Our prophet is leading us in exactly the way Jesus Christ is telling him to lead us… to accomplish His objectives for TODAY. It is why LIVING prophets are so important. People have explained it to you many, many times, you just don’t like the answer.

IMO the Fold is still there… but there seems to be something significant and maybe not quite yet revealed to me about the shift to Home-Centered-Church-Supported. Which can be harder for people in your situation and others that haven’t been able to keep a nuclear family intact or extended family close. Mine is one of those. My children have divorced parents, and one of them has lost her way. Thankfully they are resonating with my example - my oldest is on her mission and the other two come to church with me regardless of whose parent-time it is. I certainly wish the church had something ready to roll out that would replace BSA when they pulled that plug. Maybe they assumed the torch would be carried by the few who enjoyed the Scoutmaster calling. My dad was one of those. But that didn’t seem to happen. And 2020 really rocked the wards. Having moved to another ward in 2023 I’ve definitely noticed the need to actively put myself out there if I wanted to be seen and appreciated. The 90s welcoming feeling is not as present. People are nice, don’t get me wrong, but things changed. And it could be demographics as well. I dunno. I guess what I’m getting at is that I’m starting to realize that I need to make my community what I want it to be. If I want men to pick up the torch in my absence? I need to seek them out and befriend them. If I want to feel confident in a support structure in my ward? I need to create the blueprints thereof and frame it with trustworthy people. While simultaneously being those things for others. I know it can happen. It just may not be there as readily as before, therefore requiring much more effort. And there are too many other things that have changed in the last 30+ years to place the onus entirely on the church. Not that I think it’s what you’re doing, but the external factors have to be considered. Above all else, what I am striving to make sure my children know is that our Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ are real. That they are there. That they know and love each of them individually, no matter where they are or what they do. It’s the Foundation. Then they’ll have somewhere to safely stand when the mighty storms come.


Theology and personal experience

  Kirk Rollins @nicoraytruth Joseph at the graves People fixate on the golden plates and miss the real origin story. Joseph Smith was a man...